Theorists

They want handouts, something to take away and study.
  • Theorists adapt and integrate observations into complex but logically sound theories
  • They think problems through in a vertical, step-by-step logical way
  • They assimilate disparate facts into coherent theories
  • They tend to be perfectionists who won't rest easy until things are tidy and fit into a rational scheme
  • They like to analyze and synthesize
  • They are keen on basic assumptions, principles, theories, models, and systems thinking
  • Their philosophy prizes rationality and logic - "If it's logical, it's good"
  • They tend to be detached, analytical, and dedicated to rational objectivity rather than anything subjective or ambiguous
  • Their approach to problems is consistently logical
  • This is their "mental set," and they rigidly reject anything that doesn't fit with it
  • They prefer to maximize certainty and feel uncomfortable with subjective judgments, lateral thinking, and anything flippant.
  • They frequently ask questions like...
"Does it make sense?"
"How does this fit with that?"
"What are the basic assumptions?"

Strengths

  • Logical "vertical" thinkers.
  • Rational and objective.
  • Good at asking probing questions.
  • Disciplined approach.​

Weaknesses

  • Restricted in lateral thinking.
  • low tolerance for uncertainty, disorder, and ambiguity
  • Intolerant of anything subjective or intuitive.
  • Full of "should's, the oughts' and musts."​

Learns best from...

Theorists learn best from activities where:
  • What is being offered is part of a system, model, concept, theory
  • They have time to explore the associations and inter-relationships between ideas, events, and situations methodically.
  • They have the chance to question and probe the basic methodology, assumptions, or logic behind something, i.e., by taking part in a question and answer session by checking a paper for inconsistencies.
  • They are intellectually stretched, i.e., by analyzing a complex situation, being tested in a tutorial session, by teaching high-caliber people who ask searching questions.
  • They are in structured situations with a clear purpose.
  • They can listen to or read about ideas and concepts that emphasize rationality or logic and are well argued/elegant/watertight.
  • They can analyze and generalize the reasons for success or failure.
  • They are offered interesting ideas and concepts even though they are not immediately relevant.
  • They are required to understand and participate in complex situations.​

Learns least from...

Theorists learn least from and may react against activities where:
  • They are pitch-forked into doing something without a context or apparent purpose.
  • They have to participate in situations emphasizing emotions and feelings.
  • They are involved in unstructured activities where ambiguity and uncertainty are high, i.e., with open-ended problems, on sensitivity training.
  • They are asked to act or decide without a basis in policy, principle, or concept.
  • They are faced with a hotchpotch of alternative/contradictory techniques/methods without exploring any in-depth, i.e., as on a "once over lightly" course.
  • They find the subject matter trite, shallow, or gimmicky.
  • They feel out of tune with other participants, i.e., with many Activists or people of lower intellectual caliber.